2024 Case Studies

March 2024 Case Study

Authors: Cleo Whiting, BA¹, Emily Murphy, MD¹, Karl Saardi, MD¹

1. Department of Dermatology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences

A 57-year-old female with a past medical history of hypertension presented with numerous pink to skin-colored, soft, mildly tender papules and nodules on the right posterior shoulder, upper arm, and forearm (figure 1A and 1B) that appeared 15 years ago. She also complained of several deeper and larger growths on the bilateral thighs and left hip that appeared a few years ago. A shave biopsy of one of the papules was performed (figure 2A and 2B, hematoxylin-eosin staining). Immunohistochemistry was positive for S100 and negative for smooth muscle actin. A buccal swab was obtained for sequencing of the NF1 gene and the results were negative for pathogenic mutations.

Based on the clinical presentation and biopsy findings, what risks should the patient be counseled about?

A.) None, reassurance only
B.) Risk of renal cell carcinoma
C.) Risk of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor
D.) Potential inheritance of condition by offspring
E.) B & D
F.) C & D

Correct Answer: F

Explanation/Literature review:

Given the segmental distribution of biopsy-confirmed neurofibromas and negative genetic testing, the patient was diagnosed with mosaic neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Also referred to as segmental or localized NF1, this condition results from a post-zygotic pathogenic mutation in one copy of the NF1 gene.¹ Mosaic NF1 is a rare, heterogeneous disorder characterized by localized cutaneous or neural findings typical of generalized NF1, such as neurofibromas, intertriginous freckling, and multiple, large cafe-au-lait macules.² The affected NF1 gene encodes for the tumor suppressor protein neurofibromin, a GTPase-activating protein that regulates the RAS-MAPK pathway; biallelic loss of function of NF1 leads to the development of neurofibromas and other NF1-associated tumors.³

There are no specific guidelines for the management of mosaic NF1, although individuals with this condition may experience complications typical of generalized NF1, including the transformation of plexiform neurofibromas to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) (choice C), so reassurance alone is not appropriate (choice A).^2,4,5 Although rare, gonadal mosaicism is also possible and offspring of the individual can acquire generalized NF1 (choice D).⁵ The diagnostic criteria for mosaic NF1 have been recently re-established, and revealing NF1 mutations in affected skin, but not in seemingly unaffected tissues like saliva and blood, is one way to make the diagnosis.⁶

While individuals with mosaic NF1 have an increased risk of malignancy during their lifetime, renal cell carcinoma is associated with hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer [HLRCC], also known as Reed syndrome,⁷ and neurofibromatosis type 2 (choice B, E).⁸ Characterized by cutaneous leiomyomas, uterine leiomyomas, and renal cell carcinoma, HLRCC is caused by a pathogenic mutation in the fumarate hydratase gene and inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern with variable penetrance.⁷

References

1. Tinschert S, Naumann I, Stegmann E, et al. Segmental neurofibromatosis is caused by somatic mutation of the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene. Eur J Hum Genet. 2000;8(6):455-459. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200493
2. Ruggieri M, Huson SM. The clinical and diagnostic implications of mosaicism in the neurofibromatoses. Neurology. 2001;56(11):1433-1443. doi:10.1212/wnl.56.11.1433
3. Maertens O, De Schepper S, Vandesompele J, et al. Molecular dissection of isolated disease features in mosaic neurofibromatosis type 1. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(2):243-251. doi:10.1086/519562
4. Stewart DR, Korf BR, Nathanson KL, Stevenson DA, Yohay K. Care of adults with neurofibromatosis type 1: a clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2018;20(7):671-682. doi:10.1038/gim.2018.28
5. García-Romero MT, Parkin P, Lara-Corrales I. Mosaic Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Systematic Review. Pediatr Dermatol. 2016;33(1):9-17. doi:10.1111/pde.12673
6. Legius E, Messiaen L, Wolkenstein P, et al. Revised diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 and Legius syndrome: an international consensus recommendation. Genet Med. 2021;23(8):1506-1513. doi:10.1038/s41436-021-01170-5
7. Scharnitz T, Nakamura M, Koeppe E, et al. The spectrum of clinical and genetic findings in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) with relevance to patient outcomes: a retrospective study from a large academic tertiary referral center. Am J Cancer Res. 2023;13(1):236-244. Published 2023 Jan 15.
8. Paintal A, Tjota MY, Wang P, et al. NF2-mutated Renal Carcinomas Have Common Morphologic Features Which Overlap With Biphasic Hyalinizing Psammomatous Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Study of 14 Cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2022;46(5):617-627. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000001846

February 2024 Case Study

Authors: Nagasai Adusumilli, MD, MBA1

1. Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences

A 75-year-old male with a medical history of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, undergoing treatment with multiple systemic therapies, presented with 3 weeks of pink lesions on his hands, feet, and scrotum, with exquisite pain limiting ability to hold a pen and ambulate. Findings on the hands and feet are shown in Figure 1, and scrotal findings are shown in Figure 2. Notably, mucosa of the eyes, nose, mouth, urethral meatus, and anus were not involved. The patient experienced symptomatic improvement with 2 days of high potency topical corticosteroids and topical keratolytics.

Based on the clinical presentation, which of the following categories of medications has been most extensively implicated for this drug reaction?

A.) PD-1 inhibitors
B.) Beta-lactam antibiotics
C.) Aromatic anticonvulsants
D.) Sulfonamides
E.) Multikinase inhibitors

Correct Answer: E.) Multikinase inhibitors

Explanation of Correct Answer:

This patient’s clinical history and findings of multiple tender, pink-red thin macules and patches with a dusky center in the interdigital spaces of the hands, on the palmar surfaces of the fingers, and on the heels of the feet, along with scrotal desquamation, were consistent with hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) and scrotal erythema, secondary to axitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. HFSR is classically characterized by discrete, exquisitely painful lesions with a halo of erythema, and hyperkeratotic lesions localized to sites of high contact, friction, and pressure, such as tips of fingers and toes, skin overlying metacarpophalangeal or interphalangeal joints, and heels.^1,2 HFSR tends to develop within 2-4 weeks of starting multikinase inhibitors, such as sorafenib, sunitinib, cabozantinib, and axitinib (choice E), with pain that can impair range of motion, weight bearing, and overall function.^1,2 Although scrotal involvement secondary to multikinase inhibitors is not as common, scrotal erythema, desquamation, and even ulceration have been reported.³

As newer immunotherapies and small molecule inhibitors are increasingly approved for more indications, identifying common and distinct drug reactions is integral to dermatology. Although skin reactions to any medication can be varied and atypical for individual patients, the morphology can be the key to diving deeper into the medical history to pinpoint the culprit, particularly as comorbidities and polypharmacy increase. Adverse skin eruptions from programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (choice A), such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, more frequently present as morbilliform dermatoses, pruritus, lichenoid eruptions, psoriasiform dermatitis, and bullous pemphigoid.⁴ Although beta-lactam antibiotics encompass many medications, such as penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams, with a wide range of clinical presentations for drug reactions, the class overall is one of the most common causes of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis⁵ (choice B). Aromatic anticonvulsants, such as phenytoin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital (choice C) are commonly implicated in drug induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), previously drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and in Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN).⁵ Similarly, drug reactions from sulfonamides (choice D) have multiple possible presentations, but exanthematous eruption, fixed drug eruption, and SJS/TEN are the most characteristic.⁵

HFSR is often used interchangeably with palmoplantar erythrodysthesia, or hand-foot syndrome, which was initially described as a subset of toxic erythema of chemotherapies, such as taxanes, cytarabine, capecitabine, anthracyclines, and systemic 5-fluorouracil. Although HFSR can clinically appear similar to hand-foot syndrome, they are separate drug reactions, with the localized hyperkeratotic lesions with a rim of erythema distinct from the symmetric erythema, edema, paresthesia, and dysesthesia seen with hand-foot syndrome from cytotoxic chemotherapies. A high density of eccrine glands is thought to drive the skin manifestations of hand-foot syndrome⁵ whereas inhibited vascular repair mechanisms in fibroblasts and endothelial cells via VEGF and platelet-derived growth receptor (PDGFR) are hypothesized to predispose areas of trauma to HFSR.⁶ In fact VEGF and PDGFR inhibitors, such as sorafenib, sunitinib, cabozantinib, and axitinib are among the multikinase inhibitors reported to cause HFSR.^1,3,6

Contrary to the nomenclature, the tender erythematous patches and plaques are not limited to just the hands and feet. Flexural surfaces and bony prominences can also be affected. Identifying that each figure of this case illustrates areas of high friction or pressure is key to clinching the diagnosis, even without knowing the specific medications that can treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Grading the severity of cutaneous adverse events dictates the overall management strategy.⁷ Because these symptoms are limiting self-care activities of daily living, this patient has a grade 3 cutaneous adverse event,⁷ warranting collaboration with oncology colleagues to consider dose reduction, discontinuation, or temporary cessation of the causative anticancer agent.¹ In the interim, high potency topical corticosteroids and topical keratolytics, such as urea cream, may provide symptomatic relief.^1,8

References:

1. Lacouture ME, Wu S, Robert C, at al. Evolving strategies for the management of hand-foot skin reaction associated with the multitargeted kinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib. Oncologist. 2008 Sep;13(9):1001-11. PMID: 18779536.
2. Kaul S, Kaffenberger BH, Choi JN, Kwatra SG. Cutaneous adverse reactions of anticancer agents. Dermatol Clin. 2019 Oct;37(4):555-568. PMID: 3146695.
3. Zuo RC, Apolo AB, DiGiovanna JJ, et al. Cutaneous adverse effects associated with the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor cabozantinib. JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Feb;151(2):170-7. PMID: 25427282.
4. Adusumilli NC, Friedman AJ. Treating cutaneous immune-related adverse events from immune checkpoint blockade. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021 Oct 1;20(10):1133-1134. PMID: 34636526.
5. Valeyrie-Allanore L, Obeid G, Revuz J. Chapter 21 – Drug Reactions. In: Dermatology. Fourth Edition. Elsevier; 348-375.
6. Fischer A, Wu S, Ho AL, Lacouture ME. The risk of hand-foot skin reaction to axitinib, a novel VEGF inhibitor: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Investigational new drugs. 2013;31(3):787-797. PMID: 23345001.
7. NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 data files. 2017. https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/About.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2024.
8. Ren Z, Zhu K, Kang H, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the prophylactic effect of urea-based cream on sorafenib-associated hand-foot skin reactions in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):894-900. PMID: 25667293.

January 2024 Case Study

Authors: Sapana Desai & Nidhi Shah

A 29-year-old Caucasian male with history of asthma and atopic dermatitis presents with a multifocal, burning, and pruritic rash that erupted three weeks ago. On physical exam, there are innumerable, erythematous, reddish-brown papules, some with central hemorrhagic crusting spread along the chest, abdomen, and upper extremities, Figure 1. Dermatopathology findings from a subsequent punch biopsy are shown in Figure 2.

Which of the following diagnosis is the patient at an increased risk of developing?

A) Dermatomyositis
B) Postherpetic Neuralgia
C) Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
D) Mucha-Habermann Disease
E) Iron Deficiency Anemia

.           

Answer: (D) Mucha-Habermann Disease

Explanation of Correct Answer:

This patient’s clinical presentation coupled with a biopsy revealing vacuolar interface dermatitis, lymphocytes in every vacuole, erythrocyte extravasation, keratinocyte necrosis, and superficial and deep perivascular lymphoid infiltrative, is indicative of pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA).¹

PLEVA is an idiopathic, benign, cutaneous inflammatory dermatosis with increased predilection for the trunk, proximal extremities, and flexural regions. The eruption is polymorphous, as lesions exist in all stages of development, and successive crops of lesions can last from a few weeks to months or even years before resolution.^1,2 The disease does not discriminate by race or gender and primarily affects children and young adults, with a slight male predominance. While exact etiology and pathogenesis of PLEVA remains unknown, it is speculated to be an inflammatory reaction triggered by certain infectious agents with pathogens such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), Group A Streptococcus, and herpes simplex virus type 2, an inflammatory response secondary to T-cell dyscrasia, or an immune complex-mediated hypersensitivity.² PLEVA may also develop following the use of certain medications including but not limited to atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, and topical diphenylcyclopropenone.^1,2,3

Although rare, Mucha-Habermann disease (D) may follow an existing diagnosis of PLEVA or occur de novo.^2,3 Patients affected by FUMHD present with necrotic papules that progress to plaques and large coalescent ulcers. Skin ulceration can be extensive and painful, including oral and genital mucosa. Common systemic symptoms include high fever, abdominal pain, diarrhea, central nervous system manifestations, joint pain, respiratory complications, and death.^1,2,3

Explanation of Incorrect Answers:

Dermatomyositis (A) is an inflammatory myopathy with autoimmune pathogenesis affecting women more commonly than men, with a bimodal peak of incidence between ages 5 and 14 and ages 45 and 65. Clinical presentation classically encompasses a heliotrope rash (periorbital erythema with edema, occasionally involving the cheeks and nose), Holster sign (symmetric poikiloderma of the lateral thighs below the greater trochanter), and V-sign (confluent erythematous patches over the upper central chest and lower anterior neck).^3,4  Dermatomyositis is sub-classified into adult-onset disease and juvenile disease (JDM). Serum antinuclear autoantibodies are often present, as are other myositis-specific autoantibodies, which are useful as prognostic indicators while aiding in diagnosis and management of disease. Dermatomyositis is related to and possibly results from an immune-mediated process triggered by outside factors like drugs, infectious agents, and malignancy in individuals with genetic predisposition.⁴

Postherpetic neuralgia (B) is regarded as the most common long-term complication of reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV), also known as shingles.^3,5 VZV is characterized by prodrome of pain/burning followed by the onset of a rash by 7 to 10 days. The distinctive rash presents as crops of erythematous vesicles that evolve into pustules and crusts, often in a dermatomal distribution. The hallmark clinical manifestation of postherpetic neuralgia is a lancinating/burning pain in a unilateral dermatomal pattern that persists for three or more months after the onset of a herpes zoster outbreak.⁵ Well-established risk factors for postherpetic neuralgia include age, severe immunosuppression, the presence of a prodromal phase, allodynia, ophthalmic involvement, and diabetes mellitus.^3,5 Although treatment for postherpetic neuralgia is challenging, traditional non-invasive first-line therapeutic approaches include oral and topical medications, such as gabapentin, pregabalin, tricyclic antidepressants, and lidocaine 5% patch.³

Sweet syndrome is associated with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (C), a myeloproliferative disorder. Sweet syndrome, or acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, is a rare cutaneous disorder characterized by the abrupt development of painful, tender, erythematous plaques or nodules, fever greater than 38^*C, and a nodular perivascular neutrophilic dermal infiltrate without evidence of vasculitis on histologic examination.^6,7 Sweet syndrome may occur before, at the time of or after the diagnosis of malignancy. When associated with malignancy, it is more likely to be associated with older age of onset and cytopenia, and accounts for 15-20% of total cases of Sweet syndrome.⁶ While the exact pathogenesis of Sweet syndrome is elusive, genetic factors such as HLA-B54, MEFV gene mutations, and chromosome 3q abnormalities have shown to be contributory.^6,7

Iron Deficiency Anemia (E) may be associated with Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome [BRBNS/ Bean’s Syndrome]. Patients have characteristic cutaneous findings of multiple blue to violaceous soft and compressible nodules on the skin or mucous membranes that present at birth or in early childhood and develop numerous venous malformations involving the skin and gastrointestinal tract over their’ lifetime.^8,9 Typical lesions range in size from a few millimeters to up to 4 centimeters in diameter, are rubbery in consistency, and gradually evolve with time eliciting pain most prevalent at night.⁸ Uniquely, lesions swell in gravity-dependent positions, and patients exhibit focal areas of hyperhidrosis overlying these lesions. Although most cases of BRBNS are sporadic, autosomal dominant inheritance has been suggested, as well as studies reporting stem cell factor/c-kit signaling systems contributing to vascular overgrowth. Lower gastrointestinal bleeding is the most common symptom ranging from obscure to massive bleeding leading to severe iron deficiency anemia. Other rare complications may include perforation, intussusception, intestinal torsion, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and thrombocytopenia.^8,9

References

1. Pereira, N., Brinca, A., Brites, M., Juliao, M. Tellechea, O., Goncalo, M. Pityraisis Lichenoides et Varioliformis Acuta: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Dermatol. March 2012; 4(1): 61-65.
2. Teklehaimanot, F., Gade, A., Rubenstein, R. Pityriasis Lichenoides Et Varioliformis Acuta (PLEVA). StatPearls. 2023.
3. Bolognia, J., Schaffer, J., & Cerroni, L. (2018). Dermatology (Fourth edition.). Philadelphia,Pa: Elsevier.  of clinical medicine. Retrieved August 11, 2022, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32516921/
4. DeWane ME, Waldman R, Lu J. Dermatomyositis: clinical features and pathogenesis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2020 Feb 1;82(2):267-81.
5. Gruver, C., Guthmiller, K. Postherpetic Neuralagia. 2023.
6. Guarneri, C., Wollina, U., Lotti, T., Maximov, G., Lozev, I., Gianfaldoni, S., Pidakev, I., Lotti, J., Tchernev, G. Sweet’s Syndrome (SS) in the Course of Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Open Access Maced Journal Medical Sciences. January 2018; 6(1): 105-107.
7. Vashisht, P., Goyal, A., Holmes, M. Sweet Syndrome. 2023.
8. Moghadam, A., Bagheri, M., Eslami, P., Farokhi, E., Asl, A., Khavaran, K., Iravani, S., Saeedi, S., Mehrvar, A., Dooghaie-Moghadam, M. Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome because of 12 Years of Iron Deficiency Anemia in a Patient by Double Balloon Enteroscopy; A Case Report and Review of Literature. Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases. 2021; 13(2): 153-159.
9. Hu, Z, Lin, X., Zhong, J., He, Qingfang., Peng, Q., Xiao, J., Chen, B., Zheng, J. Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome with the Complication of Intussusception: A Case Report and Literature Review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(28).